Lou La Cava’s Successful Defense Leads to Dismissal of Florida Department of Health Administrative Complaint Against Physician

Louis J. La CavaLou La Cava was successful in getting a Department of Health administrative complaint against a doctor dismissed. The case was sent to him from another firm who responded to the Florida Department of Health Administrative investigation letter asking that the case be dismissed. Unfortunately, probable cause was found and an administrative complaint against the doctor was filed. A formal hearing was requested. Lou took the deposition of the expert for the Florida Department of Health Administrative and was able to get some major concessions which significantly damaged the State’s case. Lou’s client and the expert he retained did an excellent job at their depositions. After discovery was completed, the Florida Department of Health Administrative attorney agreed to resubmit the case to the probable cause panel with a recommendation it be dismissed. The probable cause panel reconsidered its previous finding and issued a dismissal of the case.

Lou La Cava and Andrew Hudson Obtained a Defense Verdict in a Medical Malpractice Case in Ocala Florida

Andrew R. HudsonLouis J. La CavaOn May 9th, Lou La Cava and Andrew Hudson received a defense verdict after a 10 day medical malpractice case tried in Ocala. The plaintiff alleged that 3 separate health care providers in an orthopedic practice failed to inform the Plaintiff of a lesion on his kidney after an MRI of his spine. Two of the providers said they informed the patient even though that conversation was not documented in the medical record. The third provider testified that she did not look at the MRI report so she would not have advised the patient about the kidney lesion. The lesion turned out to be a renal cell carcinoma and was diagnosed and treated 9 months later. The patient went on to develop metastatic disease to his lung. It was plaintiff’s position that the patient was never told about the lesion, that the providers should have given him a copy of the MRI report and they should have also sent the report to the patient’s primary care physician. They alleged the 9 month delay caused the cancer to metastasize. They claimed the patient would have had a 95% chance of survival and now the cancer was incurable. The defense position was that telling the patient met the standard of care and that the providers had a reasonable expectation he would follow up. Further, the third provider did not have an obligation to look at the MRI report during the visits she had with the patient. On causation, the defense argued that unfortunately, due to the biology of the tumor the alleged nine month delay did not change the outcome for the patient. The Plaintiffs’ attorney asked the jury to award 34 million dollars. The Plaintiffs had previously turned down some offers to settle before trial. The jury returned a defense verdict finding none of the providers liable and awarded no money damages.

Jeffrey Goodis and Jaclyn Jones Obtained a Defense Verdict in a Medical Malpractice case in Hillsborough County

Jaclyn JonesJeffrey M. GoodisJeffrey Goodis and Jaclyn Jones obtained a defense verdict for a Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician in a medical malpractice case in Hillsborough County. Plaintiffs alleged that the Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician acted with reckless disregard by failing to timely and appropriately intubate an 18-year-old patient, who arrived at the hospital with a swelling throat due to a rare hereditary condition, which resulted in the patient’s death almost a week later. Plaintiffs alleged that the patient was intubated by anesthesia in the ER, within roughly 45 minutes after arrival at the hospital, and that our client should not have waited for anesthesia, but rather, intubated herself, and sooner. Shortly after intubation, the endotracheal tube became dislodged, and the patient was reintubated during CPR. The Plaintiffs in the case, the patient’s parents, sued for wrongful death damages, requesting $40 Million Dollars from the physician, and her employer and the hospital for vicarious liability of the Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician’s alleged reckless disregard.

At trial, the defense presented evidence that the physician acted quickly and appropriately in her care and treatment of the patient. In triage, the patient could not talk and his only communication with the Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician was a few short letters typed out on is phone, an acronym for his hereditary condition. She called for anesthesia to assist with intubation of the difficult airway and was about to intubate herself when anesthesia walked in and quickly intubated on the first attempt. Our retained Pediatric Emergency Medicine expert testified that the intubation not only occurred quickly, but likely 7 minutes after the Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician first saw the patient in triage. Further, the defense established that an endotracheal tube becoming dislodged is a known complication and likely occurred shortly after a chest x-ray confirmed appropriate endotracheal tube depth. The patient’s oxygen saturations and HR started dropping after the x-ray, and the Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician recognized the issue and heroically started CPR. The patient was reintubated during CPR and there was a return of spontaneous circulation shortly thereafter. The defense expert testified that the Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician did not act with reckless disregard.

Three (3) months prior to the patient’s presentation to the ER, he had stopped taking the medication prescribed for his hereditary condition, which historically prevented laryngeal swelling. The defense established that the decedent likely waited hours or even a day, after onset of symptoms, before coming to the hospital after the episode began. The defense expert established that the failure to take his medications was the cause of his death.

After a short deliberation, the jury returned a verdict for the defendants having found that the Pediatric Emergency Medicine physician did not act with reckless disregard in her care and treatment of the patient. After rejecting reasonable offers of settlement, the plaintiffs were not awarded any monies by the jurors.

Congratulations to our new Naples Associate, Shanna Mais, for being admitted to The Florida Bar

Congratulations to our new Naples Associate, Shanna Mais, for being admitted to The Florida BarWe are pleased to announce that Shanna Mais has successfully completed The Florida Bar Exam and is now a licensed attorney!

Shanna is now an Associate at the firm’s Naples office where she will be serving our clients and handling primarily general liability matters.

Please join us in congratulating Shanna Mais on this incredible achievement and welcoming her to the practice of law.