La Cava Jacobson & Goodis Sponsors the St. Joseph’s Hospital 2023 Heroes Ball

La Cava Jacobson & Goodis Sponsors the St. Joseph’s Hospital 2023 Heroes Ball

St. Joseph’s Hospital 2023 Heroes BallThe 2023 Heroes Ball raised over $1.1 Million for St. Joseph’s Children’s Hospital’s Integrated Mental Health Program. April and Lou La Cava attended the event on behalf of the firm.

 

St. Joseph’s Hospital 2023 Heroes Ball

Jason Azzarone obtained a Final Summary Judgment in a Premises Liability Case Where the Trial Court Enforced a Contractual Exculpatory Clause

Jason M. AzzaroneJason Azzarone was successful in securing a Final Summary Judgment in Collier County in a slip and fall case where the firm represented a RV Campground. Plaintiff filed her Complaint alleging negligence stemming from an incident in which she tripped and fell on a “change in elevation of the walking surface,” of Defendant’s property. Prior to her stay at the campground, the plaintiff received rules and regulations for the campground which included an exculpatory clause. The exculpatory clause stated that the plaintiff would hold the Defendant harmless from any and all liability for personal injuries. The plaintiff acknowledged that she read the rules and regulations and signed a form acknowledging her agreement to abide by them. The Trial Court held that the exculpatory clause was valid and enforceable. In doing so, the Trial Court found the clause to be clear and unambiguous.

Thomas Saieva and Lesley Stine Obtain a Defense Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case

Thomas Saieva and Lesley Stine Obtain a Defense Verdict in Medical Malpractice Case

Lesley A. StineThomas Saieva Thomas Saieva and Lesley Stine tried a case in which it was alleged that the plaintiff sustained a perforated bowel after a laparoscopic procedure. The case involved extended care in nursing homes, and hospitals for an 11 year period. The case was supported by the testimony of excellent experts, including a GYN/Oncologist and pathologist. The defendant physician received a defense verdict. The jury concluded that the defendant physician had not perforated bowel, but rather the perforation was a result of a compromised bowel from a prior hernia repair with mesh.